Showing posts with label Documentary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Documentary. Show all posts

Wednesday, 20 February 2019

Final documentary evaluation

As part of developing a final documentary applying all knowledge built up from the moving image and sound unit, I have filmed & edited a documentary based around city life vs country life.
My documentary is about the differences between country life and city life,this including things from  employment rates to social attractions based around locations of Essex and London. I came up with my idea through thinking about passions and interests I already hold, this being the idea of travel and different locations. I chose this idea (with the help of teachers and peers) as I felt I held a genuine interest in the theme, a main element behind participatory / expository documentaries that the filmmaker is knowledgeable and passionate about their chosen topic. My choice also gave me the ability to inform myself about areas around me in the planning and pre production stage of my work when finding out facts about Essex and London. Facts included populations of areas to accompany graphics and a voice over whilst informing my audience in an expository manner. The target audience for my expository / participatory documentary ranges, from older audiences e.g 40-50+ enjoying the countryside aspect compared to other audiences from young teens and adults feeling as though they can relate more to the London life element of the documentary.

As part of finalising the unit, I have applied techniques learnt throughout the year. Being able to independently apply what I have learnt has been insightful, and has allowed clarity in the story of my documentary. For example, the voice over including voiced facts about populations of both areas and places of attractions such as Piccadilly circus in London and Sugar Hut in Brentwood, Essex, overlapping with some visuals. The cinematography of the documentary is another reason I chose this idea, as I had the opportunity to practice and present cinematic still shots, in parallel to what's being said. I had decided to film a variety amount of still shots to focus the audience's attention on the shot whilst hearing the voice over, as constant moving shots may have distracted the audience from the voice over.
One aspect in which I attempted to present in a more complex manner was the order of shots in post production editing. At the beginning and some times throughout, the idea of whether to sequence the same location shots together e.g put cinematic shots of London's Oxford Circus together then the other location of Hainault Forest Country park, or to mix the sequence with both location shots together. This was challenging however I had decided to mix the shots, to fully represent the contrast between the city and country. Shots contrasted with each other here and overall made my message of a busy life and more relaxed surrounding visually clearer, e.g a shot of the train then contrasting with a car, shots of wide amounts of people contrasting with wide fields.
Further techniques I used included interviews in both locations of London and Essex. I attempted to use the rule of thirds in all interviews for cinematically pleasing shots, and the people interviewed were not planned out beforehand. Some ethical issues I faced during the interviews was the fact that I had a few people who were not originally from the U.K therefore not as familiar about the area as hoped. However to overcome this when filming I had asked more generic questions about the city and country overall. I had faced further issues when interviewing (included in overview of filming & editing) and have learnt from these through given feedback for future projects.

Practical tasks - documentaries 
Throughout the year I have been undertaking and learning elements of film and documentary. Tasks within the film and sound category such as learning focus pull & visual effects with Adobe Audition practice, and practically three different styles of documentaries. These being Observational, Participatory and Expository. Each in which were insightful but challenging in various ways, for example, observational documentary film making in which I found the most intriguing due to the fact that the filmmaker has the desire to tell a story but has no input in the actual footage. When filming, there were advantages such as the shots, as there was a variety of camera techniques in terms of composition and shallow depth of field. Learning and practising this, I had applied the same skills within my final documentary, with the still shots focusing in and out and developed knowledge on composition, through using the rule of thirds for some focused subjects in cinematic shots and the rule of thirds in interviews. I had also learnt to do this from the expository documentary, where our participant interviews were shot using the thirds rule. However, aspects that were challenging included editing in post for observational, there were issues with time management within the group and the order of the sequence. Reflecting back, I had learnt and concluded technically to cut and edit the sequence in the way the story makes most sense, and soft skills wise to ensure there's clarity in communication when team working. Unlike the cinematography in both expository and observational, My participatory documentary had issues with the rule of thirds as my participant was placed too far off the grid. Further problems included ethical issues - as the style of documentary was an interview, when filming the answers to my questions there were a few retakes to allow the participant to search up a fact about an artist, along with the participant being a friend of mine as the filmmaker, meaning the answers were not entirely from my participants memory or entirely serious. To solve / avoid this in my final documentary, I did not know the participants used allowing more professional results and asked easier, more understandable questions. My expository documentary, filmed and edited in a group, included advantages such as voiced over facts in parallel to the footage and an interview with a few participants within our college. Cinematography wise, the framing of the shots and use of the rule of thirds made the final footage visually pleasing and successful. However, aspects that could be improved include the sound at times. As the music in the background may be distracting at times for audiences. Linking to sound and moving image, where I had practised sound editing in Adobe Audition.(overview of editing)

Practical tasks -Filming 
Learning about the 180 degree rule as part of another practical filming task was insightful and made me more aware when watching films and spotting the rule, along with spotting filmmakers who perhaps break the rule, a famous film example being Tokyo Story by Yasujiro Ozu. -http://www.criticalcommons.org/Members/ogaycken/clips/tokyostoryexample.mp4/view
Our practical task was successful in fulfilling the rule however the pre production stage of planning could have been improved, through researching filmmakers that practice or break the rule or watching short films with dialogue and characters, viewing if they've used the rule and how, along with what effect it may have had on the scene.This would allow us to fully understand the rule, contributing to our overall film knowledge in a wider context.
Focus pull, my example (documentary)
















Focus pull, my example (practical task)


Furthermore, we had also learnt the role of focus pulling. This typically used in film making to add dramaticness or effect within a scene, practising depth/shallow depth of field. There were challenges within our group in terms of filming the footage, as we struggled with time management. To overcome this challenge independently, I filmed and practised how to focus pull using a Canon camera. Though the shots I used were not in story context, they are an example of a way in which I practised and allowed me to apply my understanding of the technique. Throughout the year as there was a time management issue, I focused more on reaching deadlines and had managed to do so for my final documentary, along with using the technique in a few shots in Oxford Circus.(example) along with in other practical tasks, such as focus pulling shots in the observational documentary. A similar style I have explored for these shots, focusing on a plain subject, focusing out to a more interesting background. Further improvements include further research for focus pull, examples of films that have used the effect for dramaticness when focusing from one subject to the other, an example being Call Me By Your Name directed by Luca Guadagnino  with cinematographer Sayombhu Mukdeeprom where the focus goes from one actor to the other, expressing what they're saying to each other with their facial expressions. This being the most important element as both characters are not facing each other, whilst metaphorically speaking about each other. All these subtle elements making the scene important in the story line.
Call me by your name example - 

Another filming technique we had learnt and practised being a tracking /panning shot.
Panning shots, possibly linking to editing to make a shot look as though its been filmed throughout, is a cinematography technique that particularly intrigues me, however still requires time for me to perfect and practice more. Examples I visually enjoy and would like to take inspiration from include music videos such as The 1975's ' Sincerity Is Scary ' and Bird-man with cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki. We chose the idea of a group of people running with a scary figure following them, as the camera had the ability to follow them whilst they partook the running action and looked constant overall. An important issue/ challenge I had learnt from included looking ahead when filming a tracking shot, as there may be people or other elements to consider in a 360 degree manner as the camera pans. Planning this for locations, accounting people around at the time of day, possible background noise affecting editing in post, etc. Cinematography skills have developed through the practical tasks, with challenges including time management and planning beforehand, an overall conclusion personally being to apply and experiment more with panning shots, and research further films that use or break 180 and 360 degree rules.

Overview of filming -
The filming aspect within my documentary allowed me to apply techniques I had built up within the year from the practical tasks and personal work, such as filming for cinematic videos in practise for bigger projects.Within my documentary, there are elements that professionally represent a documentary, however some issues. Challenges include the interviews filmed in Soho, London. The people interviewed are not visually clear along with background noise from the busy city life, due to no microphone used. In comparison to the interviews filmed in Hainualt, Essex, where the people are visible with good lighting, though also distracting sound, including seagull noises. One interview is successful, filmed in Hainault, making the comparison between this and the other interviews odd in the final edit. To improve and develop this for future projects, I will plan more carefully beforehand in terms of time of day filming and what day, as locations such as the city may be even busier, along with bringing sound equipment for better end product quality. The time of day also accounting for viewing participants in a clearer way due to the lighting. Though I did not face issues with the battery or technical aspects of the camera, I will also ensure that the camera works before going on location and be sure to have extra equipment when going on location. Further challenges I faced included the footage of myself. Though the rule of thirds was used and now improved for my final documentary as learnt to use from practising in my participatory documentary (example,) some parts of the footage is out of focus. To improve this for future projects, I could be extra careful in terms of focusing, being sure that myself as the main subject is in focus continuously as I am speaking. Though not major, this is a cinematography element I will consider for more future projects.
Advantages and aspects that I have learnt whilst filming includes visually aesthetic shots, from both locations with ranging of lighting, symbolising my message and intentions further. Filming London's lights in the evening symbolises the night life the city has, especially catering for younger generations, in comparison to the sunrise and sunset of wider fields and houses, with cinematic shots of a cafe in comparison to shots of a concert and  the cinematic lighting of a sunset. The message of city vs country is expressed and visually understandable at these points of the documentary. These shots are consistent throughout, accompanying music and the documentary voice over technique. Keeping a clear message and consistency is an aspect I would like to carry out for future projects, whilst being more aware of using equipment to improve sound quality.
Footage of myself (flipped in edit)


Participatory documentary - improved rule of thirds in final documentary 



Practical tasks - editing
As part of the sound element of the units, I had initially learnt to use Adobe Audition and Foley sounds. After learning and practising more with Foley sounds for practical film and documentary tasks as the year progressed, I had started noticing scenes in which may have Foley sound rather than dietetic sounds, further expanding contextual knowledge around film-making.

Overview of editing - 

For my final documentary, this had been the first time (within the course) editing in Adobe Premiere Pro independently. This had been intriguing to start after filming, initially with the rough cut as learnt from an editing mentor, Kate Burke, learnt that getting all footage onto the timeline initially is important. Crucial aspects included in my edit includes the layering of graphics at the beginning, edited through layering in effects controls and changing the opacity blend mode to screen to make the graphics visible, along with adding text graphics throughout to accompany the voice-over. I also flipped the footage of myself using an effect called horizontal flip to make the footage look more natural and make it seem as though I am not reading. The pace of the sequence is cut on beat to the music used, however for future projects as an improvement I should use royalty free music and further improve on the sound aspect, making my work overall more professional. Cinematography wise, a visual effect called Warp stabiliser was used, to reduce shakiness of shots such as driving through fields and scenes from a concert to accompany the London element. Feedback I received from the edit included improving sound levels for the interviews, from the participants voice clashing with background noise. Another aspect learnt about sound in post from an editing mentor Ben Mallaby, always attempt to reach -12 on sound for all audios as the guideline for what doesn't sound too loud or quiet. Personally, an issue I faced towards the end was the clash between the train voice and slight noise the video naturally had, compared to no audio besides the clean audio of music therefore sounding odd. To fix this, I added the sound effect of smoothed background noise and audio transitions titled Constant gain / Constant power, to make the transition smooth. These same audio transitions applied at the beginning and end of clips when transitioning between songs.

Overall skill development -
As part of exploring the art form of film, working together in a team is an important aspect and prepares us for future crew situations, along with further soft skills such as time management. These skills have been challenged over the course of the year, with challenges in ideas clashing together in planning stages and going out to film/ gather footage. However, they have been insightful in preparation for future projects, along with working independently especially in times of editing.

Thursday, 14 February 2019

Final documentary

As part of developing a final documentary applying all knowledge built up from the moving image and sound unit, I have filmed & edited a documentary based around city life vs country life. The documentary includes techniques from the expository and participatory, e.g the voiceover recorded by the filmmaker, myself , along with interviews of people in one of my locations, with visuals accompanying. 

Video - 




Tuesday, 5 February 2019

Update - progression of my final documentary #2

As part of further progressing to the final product of my final documentary, I have filmed and completed the following -

Essex Hainault: Filmed initially, may need more footage
Home: Complete
London, kings cross extra shots: Complete
London stratford: Complete
London central: Complete
- all shots labeled complete will only need work if in the edit, there is not enough. 
Essex driving: Complete
Interviews: Complete 

Updates according to location:
Hainault country park - filming was successful however if I need to go back and film more, the shots may look different due to the time I went, being at sunset. The noise levels were limited making the interviews sound good, compared to the interviews filmed in oxford circus where there was loud background noise. The most cinematic field shots come from this location.

Home -  Sound level is good, however there are times where the shot is out of focus. Facts cover all information I wanted to add into the documentary.

Extra shots - cinematic time lapses of sunrising and sunset however unsure as to where / if to place these in the edit

Stratford - Successful needed shots, added in place of voiceover

Central - interviews have sound issues, however shots are cinematic. Good footage for cutaways

Driving - Planned to have many signposting shots however did not gather, good moving shots and some perfect to portray Essex life. May need more footage.

Sunday, 20 January 2019

Update - progression on filming my final documentary

Initially starting my final documentary, I have been out on location filming for my documentary using the shot list.

william ray ban filmmaker - inspriration




I have managed to get footage from my hainault location though I must gather more as I have put the clips in a rough cut sequence. Out of the locations, using the shotlist, I have filmed:


Essex Hainault: Filmed initially, need more footage
Home: Complete
London, kings cross extra shots: Complete
London stratford: No footage
London central: Some footage 
Essex driving: Progression

The interview and facts of the documentary are complete, and at this stage I have noticed some change must be done to the questions I have asked people at Hainault due to some closed answers.
The information and filming of myself is complete and requires trimming in Premiere Pro and must be put in order to figure out where footage fits perfectly.


Prepared speech on facts:
























Sunday, 6 January 2019

Pre production - final documentary

My ideas for the final documentary fall under the expository documentary category with my goal of making the audience think about the information given along with being more informed about areas the live in and comparison's to that - 

Themes -
  • Travel 
  • City life vs country life
  • Standard of living and quality of life
  • Norms of places, what it's overall like
Locations - 
  • London - Soho, Embankment, Canary Wharf - visually pleasing areas at night
  • Hainault Forest Country Park  - wide areas of land with public members. In outer London therefore easy o access under our time frame whilst looking successful. 
Filming - 
  • Ask a few people about whether they would prefer living in a city or countryside in the country park. 
  • Possibly film someone our age in London - use question examples
  • Still shot of the a train station 
  • Cinematic moving and still shots in London, experiment with ending the clip with a movement to the ' next clip  ' to make dramatic cuts in editing - moving from one location to the other. 
  • Film a central London shop compared to the shop in the country park
  • People in a hurry vs those walking casually
  • Shot between being in a car and being on a train
  • Shot between walking on road and concrete compared to on grass
  • Shots of people walking - only their feet compared to one or two people walking in a field
  • Contrast voice over thoughts e.g is someone says they don't like busy roads to footage of busy roads. Contrast audio with what's on screen
Filmmaker examples - 
Looking at examples of filmmakers has broadened my understanding of themes surrounding my documentary, for example, the whole travel theme 


Question examples -

  • What's your view on the central city life within London? ( mostly positive, negative etc. )
  • Do you prefer the city life or countryside life?
  • Do you like living in a city, if so, why?
  • What part of the city do you like the most?
  • Do you prefer more social things around you or a a more quiet atmosphere?
  • Did you grow up in the city or country?
  • Do you like the idea of living in the countryside, if so, why?
  • If you grew up in a different environment, do you feel that your life would be different, e.g the norms you've learnt?
  • Where's the trendiest area you know of? 
  • If you could live in any area, where would you live?

Edit -
  • Sound effects through cutting movements
  • Voice over facts about prices, quality of life and standard of living from both areas
  • Fade both music and shot when interview footage approaches
  • Music in the background over some cinematic shots, in times of no voice over or dialogue and attempt to cut on beat.
  • Starts with the aesthetic shots, music goes quiet and information about both places is given. Interview shots included here etc
Music -
- ' words ' by pools
-  Petit Biscuit - Problems instrumental

Treatment -
The outline of my film idea includes the following -
I would like to create a documentary showing the differences between living in the city and in a quiter, country place. I would like to get public views of this by asking people how they feel in both places and comparing these with each other, along with comparing things such as house pricing and quality of life. The end message should be in the audiences head of whether they think living in a city is better than maybe the countryside rather than the filmmaker, myself, having an input. I will therefore make sure that footage, statistics, answers to questions etc are balanced on both ends, giving some advantages to city life and disadvantages, vice versa, 
The target audience includes any age, with a slightly younger vibe to it as the typical age for these documentaries would be older. 
The length of the film will aim around 4/5mins.
Techniques will be explored in the cinematography, as there will be various cinematic shots of both the city and countryside locations contrasting with each other. The pace of the documentary will vary between having fast pace cuts on beat with music showing a location, to other shots just showing the environment and voiceovers of myself giving information and voices of those i'm asking questions to. 
The people involved will be those present and willing to answer questions when in central London and in the Essex area, hopefully asking as many people as possible to gain some audio voice footage and visual footage so the documentary does not seem boring from only location shots. The production schedule includes filming when dark in the city to make the footage more visually footage, therefore any day in the evening and the country park / Essex to be filmed on the weekend during the day. So the visuals match, there will also be shots of London during the day as the sun sets and shots of Essex whilst the sun rises.

Shot list -




Tuesday, 18 December 2018

Documentary evaluation

Evaluation
Learning about documentaries has been insightful yet challenging at times. Personally, I have found studying the idea of ethics in documentaries intriguing. There are many views /  stories explaining the lengths filmmakers can morally go to before it bothers and becomes an issue for the subject, this being a person or topic, some in which  I have found shocking, such as the documentation photographer Kevin Carter and the story ' The vulture and the little girl. ' The photographer captured an image of a struggling, hungered girl in South Africa with a vulture behind her. Instead of scaring or helping the girl, he captured an image and won a Pulitzer Prize award for feature photography - a journalism photography award. Months later, had committed suicide due to the guilt of not scaring the vulture or helping the girl. Ethically, I think there were issues when the photographer captured the photo and the balance between work and being emotional / human was challenged. This striked questions, such as "What is the ethically appropriate response of a documentarian faced with human misery?, What is the documenterians commitment to the truth of a situation?" all according to filmmaker professor, Linda Williams. Examples of other / further opinions include filmmaker Steve James' view, said in an interview with Filmbase - "I think you have to be willing to not film things that you really desperately want, if it helps build a connection and trust, just like you have to be willing to take things out of your movie sometimes if you feel the subjects want it out. In the best films you want to get to a place where you’re not making a documentary about your subjects but you’re making it with them."
Researching ethical issues has provided me with many filmmaker views and has provoked the thoughts and interests I hold in photography documentation. The knowledge provided has allowed me to realise ethical issues in documentation can be controversial, along with challenging the question as to what documentary truth is, and the difference between whats caught on camera and reality. 

Expository documentary
Personally, one of the most challenging topics has been expository. I have understood the concept of trying to tell a story to an audience, however I feel as though I need to practise filming myself to fully understand the style.
Our practical expository documentary is based around women's basketball and how it has changed over time, with similar themes to Ward Sirrills ' The heart of the game.'
Within the practical, there were many advantages and disadvantages. The advantages included successfully including an interview with a participant from the college in the women's basketball team along with a student in the team. The framing of the shots was successful, as the use of rule of thirds made the final footage cinematic and professional. The message itself within our theme about women's basketball changing over time was executed well through the use of voiced-over facts, along with the historical footage added in the edit. This developed and supported the story line, and is parallel to the voice over. For example, when the voice over states facts about Nancy Lieberman, a professional player, the footage is of her shooting in games, etc, adding overall clarity to the story.
However, aspects that could be improved include the sound at times. As the music in the background may be distracting at times for audiences, mostly in the main interview at the end of the documentary, where sound levels for the participant speaking could be heightened. I have
learnt, for future projects, to be sure to film in a location where not much background noise is evident / if outside, film at a particular time where students have a lesson and there are not many people surrounding in cars, etc. Other aspects such as adding another participant or footage of modern professional basketball players could be added at the end of the doc instead of the whole interview, to keep the audience interested more throughout the crucial answers of the participant.
Whilst filming, our group faced some organisational issues. This included scheduling to be able to film when the basketball court was free whilst getting our participant, the captain of the team, to also be free from her timetable. To overcome this, we decided to film the cinematic dribbling shots of the student in the team in the morning, when the court was quiet, then, film the other participant shots at lunch when they had no lessons. As this had background sound issues, I have learnt for future projects in these situations to have other locations if the desired location has a problem, or is unavailable. As we filmed in the morning, we had thoughts that the lighting would be an issue in pre - production, however during filming it proved to make the shot more visually pleasing and was not a major concern. However, if the lighting was an issue for future filming projects depending on the availability on time of day, we could fix the issue by colour correcting in post production or changing the location to a room (for example) that has windows with an outdoor view. This would therefore overall give our desired end product, by making the shots look as polished as possible.
Our documentary did not have major ethical issues, there were no shots reenacted, etc however there may have been sensitive subjects in the footage of the captain of the team being filmed. where there were people in the background of the shot playing football. Our team did not warn them about being in shot, which may have bothered them if they knew. For my final documentary, I would overall attempt to have minor ethical issues with surrounding people, along with being careful on the recording and use of sound. From this style, aspects I would use in my final documentary include a factual voice over.

Participatory documentary
The participatory documentary was an interesting learning experience through filming and editing independently. The theme of the documentary was art, and my message-  how art tells stories and creates meaning in the world, is one aspect in which I felt went well.
As the style of documentary was an interview, permission for the participant had been asked beforehand along with the only people within then documentary being me and the interviewee, meaning no unauthorised filming of anyone else. However, when filming the answers to my questions there were a few retakes to allow the participant to search up a fact about an artist. In the interview, this is perceived as the fact being from previous memory, therefore making that section of asking the question problematic. To resolve this issue for any future filming processes, I could style or change the question so it's purely based on the participants previous knowledge and nothing affecting that once hearing the question.
What went well cinematically was the location, which was in the TV studio of the college. I had placed the props so that there were a few colours evident in the background, from a green and white curtain, pink sofa and black wall. Cons in the documentary including the framing, which is a mistake I had realised when editing. I had attempted to use the rule of thirds however placed the subject too far out of the grid, which also proved to be an issue when scaling and positioning in Premiere Pro. I have learnt, for future projects, to consider the rule more and be sure that the subject has some space on both the left and right side of them, to edit and make the footage as professional as possible.
Independent editing  however allowed me to experiment and apply knowledge I had learnt outside the course, through a masterclass with a professional Ben, teaching BFI academy students on the 3rd of November, 2018. For example, being able to cut quickly between videos due to shortcuts learnt such as  'Q' to cut the start of a video along with deleting the gap, & 'W' for the end of videos and a sequence.
The video itself is clear and has issues which have been resolved in editing for example using the flip effect in Premiere Pro. I had also learnt this in the academy, with a professional editor, named Kate. This has helped me develop my knowledge within the software and has resolved issues with continuity. However, though the continuity issue with the footage of myself was resolved, there were issues on trying to cut when I am looking at the participant answering her questions, as I spoke too soon before and after each question. From this, I have learnt to always give two to three seconds between speech to allow time for cutting. I also learnt this when helping other groups film, along with filming outside the course - giving a few seconds for each action and cut to help in the edit. Also, in editing, to trim on action and cut from the director when possible / if appropriate. ( not appropropriate in times where the cut must start mid way during a characters action, etc)
I will take forward all skills learnt in the editing for my final documentary along with using cinematic rules like the thirds if an interview is included within my final footage. Other factors I may experiment with and consider in an interview situation is to allow the participant to answer freely without being concluded by another question, and allowing the idea of this to flow in the edit. To prepare for this, I could make the participant start the beginning of their sentences with a response to the question, so that the audience have clarity on what the person is answering without the actual question, for example, " who is your favourite artist " cut out to the answer" my favourite artist is..." I had also learnt this skill when helping a filmmaker ask teachers within the college various questions.
Other issues I faced in pre production of the participatory documentary included organisational, scheduling issues. The initial locations to film were the photography studio with a student studying photography, with the questions based around creative subjects sometimes being not as supported as core subjects would be, whether the participant agreed with the idea of that or not, etc. However, due to scheduling issues the participant was not free to film at times I was, along with the availability of the studio. This therefore meant I had to ask another student, however the delay meant I had less time for editing. From my last reflection about time management and backups, I had a few students in backup for unreliability. My questions and theme therefore changed to art, also because I wanted to stay in the same path as creative subjects and platforms, and concluding a message from within an art form.

Observational documentary-
I found this style of documentary most appealing to experiment with & found the concept of attempting to show a message or story interestingly challenging when the filmmaker traditionally has no input. Our example was based around a member from our class and their photography process - behind the scenes of the photos, etc. What went well was the cinematography for some shots, ranging from using shallow depth of field, close ups & hand held shots, following the photographer from a lesson to their habitat of the photography studio. The idea of having aesthetic shots and practising some of this within our documentary is a skill I would like to continue for my final documentary and in future projects. A cinematographer who I have therefore researched and aspire to follow in the industry is Darius Khondji, with examples of stunning shots in 'The beach,' directed by Danny Boyle. Viewing more of his work in the lead up to our final documentaries will give me insight / inspiration on viewing a location through the lens for final cinematic footage. Unlike the filming schedule for the other two styles of documentary, our crew finished and edited the final footage in time, though the process was elongated by some shots and attitudes.
There were also issues that were evident in editing where footage that made the observant not seem as professional or serious had been added in, along with an ethical issue of footage that the group did not know was being recorded, added into the final cut of the video. One of the filmmakers, the editor of the group, therefore did not consider a subjects desires by asking permission. To avoid this in future situations, we must make sure the whole group is certain on a final edit &  has viewed all footage and the subjected person is exceptional on what is being shown before it's finally exported. 
Issues I may face when filming an observational documentary may include what happened within our group where there may be filming when the subject is unaware. As my views on ethical issues agree with statements such as You owe your audience to tell the truth, to get to the bottom of the story, to be accurate in what you’re presenting.” said by Gordon Quinn, a documentary director. I would be considerate as to what the subject would like to be finally shown. If the observant theme requires the subject to not know they are being filmed, I may, instead of releasing footage that they are unaware of, plan the scenes to portray the same messages without the subject being hurt in the end. Although, some may disagree with the concept of this as the question of documentation being real is raised as stated earlier from Linda Williams. Overall learning about observational documentaries has intrigued me and I have set goals to challenge myself if I chose this style of documentary finally. 

Conclusion - 
Learning about all 3 documentary styles has proven to be challenging, but also insightful as I have learnt much more about this side of filmmaking and aspects behind it. Researching into ethical issues has provided me with knowledge that I will consider in all future projects, along with now being more skillful at things such as editing in Premiere Pro by having the opportunity to develop and express what i've learnt. In my final documentary, I would definitely attempt to film in a way that allows a message and story to come across for the audience.

Bibliography -
Ethical research: 
https://cricketnthebrain.wordpress.com/2010/05/29/the-ethics-of-documentary-intervention-dennis-orourkes-the-good-woman-of-bangkok-linda-williams-documentary-ethics-lecture/
https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-wolfpack-and-the-ethics-of-documentary-filmmaking
http://www.columbia.edu/itc/film/gaines/documentary_tradition/Williams_EthicsofIntervention.pdf
http://filmbase.ie/an-interview-with-documentary-filmmaker-steve-james/#.XBkv0mj7RPY
http://www.tasteofcinema.com/2014/20-directors-who-are-good-at-making-visually-stunning-films/


Expository documentary:
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2024238/

Observational documentary:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darius_Khondji
https://www.indiewire.com/2014/10/the-ethics-of-documentary-filmmaking-69007/






Monday, 17 December 2018

Participatory documentary practical

As part of initially learning about documentaries, I filmed a participatory documentary using someone who studies art within sixth from. The footage includes me as the filmmaker gathering information using my own knowledge, as a typical style of participatory documentary would, though there are improvements to be made. For example, framing the participant more into the grid of rule of thirds.
I have, to my fullest, attempted to get a clear message in which I wanted the audience to know - how art tells stories and creates meaning in the world.

Link to video:


Sunday, 2 December 2018

Pre production - participatory documentary

Person to interview: Currently studying art
Filming location: A room in my house with lights and art related ornaments
Subject: Art tells stories and allows people to express themselves.

Questions:
Do you enjoy art & why?

What is your go to / preferred type of art technique?

Who is your favourite artist - have they done something impact that's stuck in your head -

Are there stories behind their art pieces?

What is the one thing you wish you knew when you started in this creative platform?
When you practise art, do you usually have a message or something you want to say behind it?

Do you think people in your class and yourself do art to express something, this being an emotion or something you would like to say?

and finally -  Do you think art plays a big role in creating meaning and telling stories in the world?















Saturday, 1 December 2018

Participatory documentaries

Participatory documentaries involve the filmmaker and is a collaborative process, engaging audiences to hear someones story by the filmmaker asking questions to someone /people about a story they are carrying out. This could be as minor as the filmmaker’s voice being heard behind the camera, prodding subjects with questions or cues — all the way to the filmmaker directly influencing the major actions of the narrative
The process involves designing a storytelling process which may reflect the voices and leadership of people impacted by an event or ongoing situation. Some communities / people may wish to ' expose ' a certain story, therefore are in a unique position to offer expert documentation, analysis and research. 
These documentaries are one sided and come from the directors point of view. They strive to show a story or message that the filmmaker wants the audience to see.



Friday, 23 November 2018

Observational documentary practical

 For our observational documentary, we decided to follow around one of group members. We had based it on one of his passions, being photography. No input had been put in by the filmmakers and crew, being the rest of our group, in observational style.
The documentary had some pros such as some cinematic shots and following the  main character and using the camera as a 'fly on the wall ' however the lighting of the shots could be improved and more information as to the editing of the photographer could be added as more insight to their life.


Thursday, 22 November 2018

Observational documentaries

Observational documentaries - documentaries shot in a specific style of following action around as it happens like ' a window of the world ' therefore having not much post production input - no voice over or much editing. There is also no input from the film crew, these documentaries are shot so that the audience has their own opinion with no input.
These documentaries may make the audience feel part of whats happening therefore provide insight to information this way, instead of feeding it to them through a voice over. They allow the subject to ' move ' freely without much editing and connect the audience by making them focus solely on the story line and narrative of whats being told.
These types of documentaries were popular during the 1960's and are referenced as being a type of ' fly on the wall ' presentation.

Some common and set characteristics of observational documentaries include:
  • Speech which is overheard and not directed to the camera or audience
  • Synchronous sound 
  • Do not hear or see filmmaker, no voice over
  • Zoom lenses and hand held camera - further in-forcing the idea of the audience being real and close with whats happening along with camera following the action


Example: Salesman 1968
In this example, it is evident that there is no voice over, and the story line is carried out through the dialogue of the characters. Music has also been added, which is parallel to whats happening on screen and enhances the story. Though not the longest, some takes within the scene are long and take a few seconds to cut compared to an expository documentary. An example is with planet earth. Though some are long, most takes are cut quickly and include a voice over at every scene providing detail. This documentary however is an opposite example.
Further techniques included in Salesman are synchronized sound. 





Tuesday, 20 November 2018

Expository documentary practical


To initially explore expository photography, our group decided to chose sport as a topic and focus around women's basketball. The idea of women's sports is modern and will intrigue a similar aged audience along with intriguing them to watch. The documentary gives more information than what an
audience member would know by solely watching a game, by providing many role model names and historical stories / events.
Within our group, we each gave ourselves different roles in order to complete on time.These were shared and doubled at times, for example , cinematographer and editor, screenwriter and voice over, interviewer and interviewee etc.
The scene includes an interview with the captain of the colleges basketball team along with historical facts and figures of women's sport and basketball overall worldwide.

Script for documentary -https://writerduet.com/script/#VWRJW






















Thursday, 8 November 2018

Expository documentaries

These type of documentaries usually give insight into certain topics and provide information directly to the audience through voice overs and titles. There is a constant link between what we see and what we hear as an audience in these documentaries, keeping us focused onto the information. The crew behind expository documentaries include commentators, a director, camera operators etc. There may also be a professional figure providing information about the specific topic.
Compared to a observational documentary, sound is a big, key aspect.
The clip shown is a scene from planet earth which is based around wildlife and landscape documentary. David Attenboroughs voice in the background gives insight of what's happening and informs the audience. Its in sync / parallel to the action shown on screen, and is a prime example of an expository documentary. The side of wildlife is exposed and there is constant information given by the specialist. 


University research